Raleigh PR| Triangle Educators Speak Out On Ayers

Controversial Professor Is Central To Presidential Election Race

Faculty members at any of the Triangle’s major universities frequently find themselves in the spotlight, be it for recognition of achievement or research news. But sometimes the story is less than glowing — such as today’s revelation by Eric Ferreri of The News and Observer that several members of local academia have signed a national petition giving support to Bill Ayers.

I’ll stay out of the political muck in discussing Ayers. Essentially, he and wife Bernadine founded radical group Weather Underground in 1969, and were indicted a year later on charges of inciting to riot and conspiracy to bomb public buildings, but due to prosecutorial misconduct, all charges were dropped. Still, Weather Underground did carry out bombings that killed people, although Ayers was not accused in relation to any fatal incident.

Today, Ayers is a professor at the University of Illinois-Chicago, and wife Bernadine teaches at the Northwestern University law school. Bill Ayers has, by many accounts, reformed into a premier scholar on education.

But as many have launched questions as to the extent of the relationship between Democratic Presidential candidate Barack Obama and Ayers, several local professors have put themselves out there in defense of Ayers, who they say has atoned for crimes committed four decades ago and thus is no different from a reformed ex-convict.

Of course, the faculties of Triangle universities have long championed their free speech as an indication of how forward-thinking the state’s higher education proves to be. Most famous is Duke University’s “Group of 88″, whose advertisement in the school’s newspaper helped fuel the controversy surrounding the Duke lacrosse case in 2006.

Should local professors willingly embroil themselves into these issues, knowing that their actions might reflect on the institutions they work with? It’s a gutsy move to defend Ayers, and in this case — that is, defending someone who has garnered praise for his higher education work — their input is relevant. But after instances such as the “Group of 88,” careful consideration is necessary. Schools such as UNC and Duke — who both employ professors on the Ayers petition — are not going to stifle free speech anytime soon, and they shouldn’t. But whenever their representatives step into a heated debate, they must remember that our esteemed academic reputation isn’t bulletproof.

Does your company need a public relations firm in Raleigh?  In North Carolina?  Visit the MMI Associates website for more information.  Any questions?  Please give me, Patty, a call at 919-233-6600.

Related Links

Raleigh NC| The Wall Street Roller Coaster

Raleigh NC| Apex Sports Center Rebounds

MMI Associates, Inc.

3 Comments »

  1. Ruby Sinreich Said,

    October 15, 2008 @ 5:06 pm

    This blog entry didn’t really say much that one could disagree with, but I was stunned by this statement: “Controversial Professor Is Central To Presidential Election Race.” Do you really think that Ayers is central? IN what way?

    It seems to me that Ayers in a tangential strawman at best. Is this post just Google-fodder or do you have a personal opinion or insight to share?

  2. Bobby Said,

    October 15, 2008 @ 5:19 pm

    Thanks for commenting. I did not write this post, but I do contribute to the blog. Personally, I don’t think he will be remembered as being central to this election. He is however, currently a big topic on the talk shows we like to call 24 hr news channels.

    I believe that if Ayers was going to be a problem for Obama, he would have been a problem a long time ago. I agree with you that he will probably, in retrospect, be a footnote of this year’s election and not a central figure.

  3. Jake Said,

    October 16, 2008 @ 8:43 am

    Ruby,

    I interpreted Barack Obama’s statements regarding the topic during the debate last night to mean that John McCain’s campaign has made Ayers a rallying point. Whether it will be equally central for many voters is anyone’s guess; I tend to agree that Ayers shouldn’t be a deciding factor. My characterization of it as “central” was simply based on the fact that one candidate has injected it into the campaign, knowing that it would sprout wings.

Leave a Comment